<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Source versus Open Standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vishalvasu.com/open-source-versus-open-standards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vishalvasu.com/open-source-versus-open-standards/</link>
	<description>Opening Doors to Windows Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:24:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.vishalvasu.com/open-source-versus-open-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vishalvasu.com/?p=246#comment-226</guid>
		<description>Here is an interesting video on YouTube that gives more insight: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOz5zInHARA&amp;feature=player_embedded</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is an interesting video on YouTube that gives more insight: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOz5zInHARA&amp;feature=player_embedded" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOz5zInHARA&amp;feature=player_embedded</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://www.vishalvasu.com/open-source-versus-open-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 05:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vishalvasu.com/?p=246#comment-224</guid>
		<description>This is a great post and has so much clarity in this. Landed up here while reading a similar post at http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/08/21/all-open-source-software-is-commercial/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great post and has so much clarity in this. Landed up here while reading a similar post at <a href="http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/08/21/all-open-source-software-is-commercial/" rel="nofollow">http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/08/21/all-open-source-software-is-commercial/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vishal Vasu</title>
		<link>http://www.vishalvasu.com/open-source-versus-open-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Vishal Vasu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vishalvasu.com/?p=246#comment-223</guid>
		<description>@ Pranav Pandya - Sure can try putting these thoughts in to a PPT format. Need some time to work on it but promise it will be there in the near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Pranav Pandya &#8211; Sure can try putting these thoughts in to a PPT format. Need some time to work on it but promise it will be there in the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pranav Pandya</title>
		<link>http://www.vishalvasu.com/open-source-versus-open-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Pranav Pandya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vishalvasu.com/?p=246#comment-222</guid>
		<description>Abhishek you can say it twice over for me. I completely agree with his comments. Infact for the first time such clarity is being read by me on the said topic or may be alternatively I have not come across a clearer article on the said topic till date. Vishal is it possible to put your thoughts in ppt bearing few slides describing the said topic in a lucid fashion such that many of the public sector personnel as per my perception would be able to comprehend the topic better in ppt format. It will thus help in spreading awareness among the public secor community towards giving priority to interoperability, scalability, security patches, etc simillar topics being handeled by a proprietary software adhering to open standards rather than adopting opensource version with no such assurance and legal indeminty towards future technical longitivty oriented roadmap outlined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Abhishek you can say it twice over for me. I completely agree with his comments. Infact for the first time such clarity is being read by me on the said topic or may be alternatively I have not come across a clearer article on the said topic till date. Vishal is it possible to put your thoughts in ppt bearing few slides describing the said topic in a lucid fashion such that many of the public sector personnel as per my perception would be able to comprehend the topic better in ppt format. It will thus help in spreading awareness among the public secor community towards giving priority to interoperability, scalability, security patches, etc simillar topics being handeled by a proprietary software adhering to open standards rather than adopting opensource version with no such assurance and legal indeminty towards future technical longitivty oriented roadmap outlined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vishal Vasu</title>
		<link>http://www.vishalvasu.com/open-source-versus-open-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator>Vishal Vasu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 09:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vishalvasu.com/?p=246#comment-175</guid>
		<description>Here is an interesting article that I came across in the PC Quest issue of June 2009.

http://pcquest.ciol.com/content/search/showarticle1.asp?arid=112003&amp;mode=disp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is an interesting article that I came across in the PC Quest issue of June 2009.</p>
<p><a href="http://pcquest.ciol.com/content/search/showarticle1.asp?arid=112003&#038;mode=disp" rel="nofollow">http://pcquest.ciol.com/content/search/showarticle1.asp?arid=112003&#038;mode=disp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhishek</title>
		<link>http://www.vishalvasu.com/open-source-versus-open-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhishek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vishalvasu.com/?p=246#comment-172</guid>
		<description>Nice insightful article Vishalbhai. Honestly I understood the exact difference between open source and open standard today. So far I was having some vague idea about the same. Keep writing good stuff like this and keep spreading the knowledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice insightful article Vishalbhai. Honestly I understood the exact difference between open source and open standard today. So far I was having some vague idea about the same. Keep writing good stuff like this and keep spreading the knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vishal Vasu</title>
		<link>http://www.vishalvasu.com/open-source-versus-open-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Vishal Vasu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vishalvasu.com/?p=246#comment-171</guid>
		<description>Hi Alain, thanks for the in-depth comments on the topic. You are absolutely right. Microsoft has been taking a beating since long over this, especially in the public sector. One area that needs to be looked in to is that most documents in the public or private sector are currently stored in formats of doc, xls, etc and not OpenDocument Format (ODF). How are these going to be converted on a large scale?

I&#039;ve tried a few checks by creating a document in MS Office 2007 - which has incorporated the OOXML standard - and then opened and saved this in OpenOffice (ODF format). It gives out thousands of errors.

Many websites have thrased Microsoft on the adoption/promotion of OOXML, but if this standard meets the market needs better, why should it not be adopted?

Would like to share a link which I keep an eye on: http://www.durusau.net/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Alain, thanks for the in-depth comments on the topic. You are absolutely right. Microsoft has been taking a beating since long over this, especially in the public sector. One area that needs to be looked in to is that most documents in the public or private sector are currently stored in formats of doc, xls, etc and not OpenDocument Format (ODF). How are these going to be converted on a large scale?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried a few checks by creating a document in MS Office 2007 &#8211; which has incorporated the OOXML standard &#8211; and then opened and saved this in OpenOffice (ODF format). It gives out thousands of errors.</p>
<p>Many websites have thrased Microsoft on the adoption/promotion of OOXML, but if this standard meets the market needs better, why should it not be adopted?</p>
<p>Would like to share a link which I keep an eye on: <a href="http://www.durusau.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.durusau.net/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alain</title>
		<link>http://www.vishalvasu.com/open-source-versus-open-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Alain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vishalvasu.com/?p=246#comment-168</guid>
		<description>Vishal,
I think that your question is the good one, and that your arguments are rights!

Just to let you know about my background before answering to your question : I&#039;ve been working 10 to 12 years with Sun Microsystems (the open standard supporter), and I&#039;m the co-founder of a software vendor, Jalios, a portal/ECM/ESN ISV(closed-source, supporting open (useful) standards!

I believe (but I can explain why) that it&#039;s better that your software supports open standards (closed source, available thru escrow service, just in case) than be open source... ( except maybe if it&#039;s a community-based open source (FSF, Apache, Mozilla? ...).

Indeed, as a user, I don&#039;t care about the source code (only if my vendor goes chapter 11). This is because, I would be unable to understand/modify the code that I would&#039;t have developed, but I do care about open standards because I would be able to integrate the application within my IT with the other applications.

What I also do care about is administration, innovation, ease of use, scalability, support, roadmap, security... and I do believe that I have more chance to find it working with a closed-source application vendor (more revenue) than working with a (commercial) open source vendor.

Best Regards
google.com/profiles/Alain.Risbourg
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vishal,<br />
I think that your question is the good one, and that your arguments are rights!</p>
<p>Just to let you know about my background before answering to your question : I&#8217;ve been working 10 to 12 years with Sun Microsystems (the open standard supporter), and I&#8217;m the co-founder of a software vendor, Jalios, a portal/ECM/ESN ISV(closed-source, supporting open (useful) standards!</p>
<p>I believe (but I can explain why) that it&#8217;s better that your software supports open standards (closed source, available thru escrow service, just in case) than be open source&#8230; ( except maybe if it&#8217;s a community-based open source (FSF, Apache, Mozilla? &#8230;).</p>
<p>Indeed, as a user, I don&#8217;t care about the source code (only if my vendor goes chapter 11). This is because, I would be unable to understand/modify the code that I would&#8217;t have developed, but I do care about open standards because I would be able to integrate the application within my IT with the other applications.</p>
<p>What I also do care about is administration, innovation, ease of use, scalability, support, roadmap, security&#8230; and I do believe that I have more chance to find it working with a closed-source application vendor (more revenue) than working with a (commercial) open source vendor.</p>
<p>Best Regards<br />
google.com/profiles/Alain.Risbourg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Trackbacks for Open Source versus Open Standards &#124; [vishalvasu.com] on Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.vishalvasu.com/open-source-versus-open-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Trackbacks for Open Source versus Open Standards &#124; [vishalvasu.com] on Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vishalvasu.com/?p=246#comment-167</guid>
		<description>[...] Open Source versus Open Standards &#124;  www.vishalvasu.com/general/open-source-versus-open-standards &#8211; view page &#8211; cached  Everyone’s talking about open source and open standards now-a-days but hardly have I come across any who knows what exactly it contains and what the &#8212; From the page [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Open Source versus Open Standards |  <a href="http://www.vishalvasu.com/general/open-source-versus-open-standards" rel="nofollow">http://www.vishalvasu.com/general/open-source-versus-open-standards</a> &ndash; view page &ndash; cached  Everyone’s talking about open source and open standards now-a-days but hardly have I come across any who knows what exactly it contains and what the &mdash; From the page [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
